These were the efforts put in from 1964-71. But then it was felt that our zeal had a fall, a decline, mostly because we had to expend lot from our pockets and most of the trustees were bogged with family, household, occupational responsibilities and probably also had a feeling of satisfaction with which we had exhaustively put efforts over these years, feeling dreams come true. We had thoughtful plans for few more years, upto 1974-75 and the activities were entrusted with the organizational workers and partner organizations.
And suddenly the country experienced a tremor, a natural disaster, a nationwide shock ‘the drought of 1972’ All equations faltered and abated, no crops, food scarcity, problems of drinking water, sudden fall in water table, pity faces, no employment opportunities and handcuffed situation. It was our first experiences of extreme vagaries and we felt as heading a dead block. Similar was the condition of other organizations and development workers. Policies were not favouring and administration co-cocked at many fronts. One example, Public Distribution System collapsed, there was immense scarcity of foodgrains but still we could not bring wheat from Punjab and we had to distribute sattu to the affected people. There were so many problems cropping up all at one time. In these two years rom 72 to 74 all of us working in development sector and also all the trustees of Mandal had discussions and deliberations on this critical and emergent issue. In 1974 a seminar was conducted for drought mitigation, which spoke aloud the need for water conservation.
Dr Moses (FROM) was instrumental (IN). 22-24 water conservation structures were constructed in Revgaon and that too at meager cost of Rs. 5 lakhs. Handpump manufacturing was extended with assistance from UNICEF along with training for handpump repair and maintenance. Drilling boreholes and installing handpump was a major activity undertaken in whole of Central Maharashtra. AFPRO took up this activity on a large scale. We failed to in this ‘business’ and had to declare ourselves bankrupt. Despite of all this work was going on but concurrently voice was raised against working further and at that stage Mandal was on the verge of dissolution. Most of the members disagreed for continuation, still it was pleaded to think over, plan and work out suitable and feasible strategies with internal as well as external experiences and learning. Need to strengthen local structures came out prominently, which should set up Agriculture Development Fund to shield and safeguard livelihood of poor in natural calamities and to carry on resource conservation at community level. Incidentally, efforts of development workers in Maharashtra led to formation of a consortium for agriculture renewal, AFARM. ‘Food for Work’ sowed the seeds of watershed development. Villagers of Dev Pimpalgaon approached Mandal to undertake employment-oriented activities for the poor labourers. As digging or drilling wells as a strategy was showing its limitations in addressing the real problems, Mandal started working with the concept of "recharging of aquifers" as a strategy to counter the ill‑effects of drought. MSSM had experimented on “artificial recharge” in village Revgaon, Later, the approach was refined and adopted in village Dev‑Pimpalgaon during 1978-82 after the drought, with support from Swiss Development Cooperation (SDC) and technical guidance of Action for Food Production (AFPRO) GIT-I.
It was decided to construct a percolation tank in the village. Geo-hydrological survey was conducted with technical assistance of AFPRO. During execution of this tank, as an opportunity, agriculture and drought were discussed at community level and various technical and social measures were planned for further action. Initially OXFAM and later SDC provided funding for this project. Convinced with the activities implemented, people of Dev Pimplagaon came together to take the challenge and wage their efforts against drought. Dev Pimpalgaon taught that any meaningful development in rural areas can be only through regeneration of the environment and this is possible by creating faith in soil & water conservation and afforestation, along with agriculture development. This work started showing its impact realised by 1981.
|
Dev Pimpalgaon demonstrated importance of soil & water conservation, afforestation and agriculture development and served as field institution for further projects and concepts to come. A study to develop a perspective plan for the upper Dudhana basin was undertaken. Many eminent people from all over the state and country visited Dev Pimplagaon and also farmers from many villages were invited for farmer meets. Integration of man, land, water and trees was preached and self-initiative for self-development was prophesied. These open house gatherings and discussions created interest and willingness to participate in such activities. One such village that evinced interest in similar kind of progression was Adgaon. By this time lot of water had gone below the bridge. Efforts put in over in last 18-20 years were contemplated and from the experiences and learning fundamental and vital thoughts were put in for Adgaon project. There were few unanswered questions still but Adgaon took a course that was more convinced though was a path not taken.
Over the next three years, people of Adgaon and MSSM negotiated the technical options and work methodology, in consultation with several institutions like International Crop Research Institute for Semi‑Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), AFPRO, WALMI, State Departments of Soil Conservation, Social Forestry, as well as concerned individuals and experts in the field. With Adgaon project, MSSM demonstrated a pragmatic, viable and replicable approach to management of land and water resources on watershed basis to overcome the ill effects of drought. Adgaon project, a national example of integrated watershed development, was helpful to planners and practitioners to formulate policies and programmes for poverty alleviation and drought proofing on sustainable basis. The learning from Adgaon project had been a great help in formulation of Indo-German Watershed Development Programme.
Adgaon and its experiences and achievements stood high to dwindle the pros & cons of watershed development vis-a-vis natural resource management. It was not that other organizations did not take an approach of natural resource development, but the efficacy was people came together, planned the project depending on their needs and showed a way that though ‘water’ a most important resource for agriculture development and rural livelihood promotion, it was basically ‘soil’ the most important resource and ‘watershed’ the most appropriate manageable unit to scale soil & water conservation and agriculture management activities as core paradigm for rural development. |
|